María, 24, Colombian.
Random things that make me laugh at 3am.
Sometimes NSFW.

andonandon:

fair-itself:

romeoandjulietfan:

Romeo + Juliet (1996) Trivia: Shakespeare described Tybalt swordsmanship as “showy”. To transform this into flamboyant gunplay, John Leguizamo worked with choreographer John ‘Cha Cha’ O'Connell to create a flamenco-inspired style.

This is the new gender John Leguizamo invented that one time in case anyone was curious

image

(via ameliafromafairytale)

Notes
90859
Posted
6 months ago

willowcrowned:

so-many-ocs:

“how’s the writing going?” i’m glad you asked! my room has never been cleaner and i’ve decided to take up baking

“how’s the cleaning going?” thanks for checking in! I’ve written four chapters :)

(via ameliafromafairytale)

Notes
91905
Posted
9 months ago

violaobanion:

MARIE ANTOINETTE
2006, dir. Sofia Coppola

Notes
1456
Posted
9 months ago

academicblorbo:

prettysicksupply:

adoring-suggestion:

The adhd modes of food

1. You ate that burger so fast. You ate that burger so fucking fast and now the whole Red Robin is staring at you god what the fuck

2. You started eating like a normal person, but then you started talking or daydreaming and now the waitress is handing you the check but you’ve still got half a plate of cold fettuccine

3. You were going to go out to eat, but then you saw a video in your YouTube recommendation that drew you towards it like moth to a flame, and now it’s 10 pm and you’ve got an empty bag of tortilla chips in your hand and shame in your heart

4. Mac And Cheese

5. You got engrossed in a project, suddenly you feel like you’re going to die, or faint, or both? Oh. you’re hungry.

6. You’re hungry.  But every food you can think of sounds disgusting.  Time for your 15th day of lunchables for breakfast in a row.

7. The food you’ve been obsessively eating for the past 2 weeks and you relied on is now the grossest thing you could put in your mouth

(via ameliafromafairytale)

Notes
116458
Posted
10 months ago

the major takeaway from last night is that Karl Lagerfeld was more of a personality than a designer and that Yves Saint Laurent was the clear winner of that rivalry.

omgthatdress:

For those who aren’t familiar, Karl Lagerfeld and Yves Saint Laurent were both fashion wunderkinds who emerged in the late 1950s, both appointed heads of major brands at the same time, and had very intense rivalry. Yves Saint Laurent took over Dior after the passing of Christian Dior, helped cement the brand as a major player in fashion, and then after a disastrous stint being drafted into the French army, built his own fashion brand that went down in history with its unique and diverse and always evolving looks.

Karl was always kind of behind Yves. He designed for a lot of major fashion brands, and managed to establish himself at the top of the game at Chloé, but he didn’t get his full on legendary status until he took over Chanel in 1983. This history of the Chanel brand was already pretty frought, with Coco Chanel modernizing and defining the fashion of the 1920s and 30s, but being forced to shut down during World War 2, during which she collaborated with the Nazis. Behind the Bastards did a pretty great two episodes on her. When the brand returned in the 60s, fashion had changed tremendously. Dior, Givenchy, Balenciaga, and Balmain had all taken over mid-century fashion, and now that aesthetic was being taken over by mod, the miniskirt, and the likes of Mary Quant, Pierre Cardin, and Paco Rabanne. So when Chanel came back it was largely seen as a stuffy old lady brand, which it remained until Karl took it over.

Now, this is where Karl actually did something really impressive that you honestly can’t take away from him: he took a fashion house in severe decline, one that had been in its flop era for literal decades, and he made it hip again, while still managing to stay true to the ethos that Coco Chanel had laid out.

Chanel is clean, minimalistic, and classy. It is easy to wear, effortless, and always extremely glamorous, which is what made it so iconic in the 20s and 30s. Given that the 50s and 60s were all about making a fucking effort, the thing that the brand managed to keep doing well was its suits. You know what kind of suits I’m talking about. Tweed jackets and midi skirts, neat tailoring, delicate pastel colors, pearls and camellias and chains. It’s not so much that it was edgy and exciting but it was expensive and it was *Chanel* and people wore it for the status symbol alone. That is what Karl took advantage of and managed to re-invent.

image

That sort of aesthetic fit perfectly into the you-can-never-be-too-rich-or-too-skinny 80s, when wearing status symbol clothing was everything.

Then, in the 90s, he managed to keep things exciting by following exactly what was on-trend at the time and incorporating elements of street wear and hip-hop.

image

However, after that, he kind of lost his edge and just rested on “it’s Chanel” rather than actually pushing the fashion envelope. By the time he died in 2019, he was a fucking dinosaur and fashion had long since moved past him. The thing that he was ultimately most well known for was his own very distinctive look and flamboyant personality.

image

Before I ever started studying fashion, I knew who Karl was because I’d seen him so many times, and I’d seen parodies of him so many times. I knew *him* but I didn’t really know his work. And I think having an incredibly boring Met Gala dedicated to him reveals that: his actual artistic legacy is skinnier than the models he used to berate. Karl Lagerfeld built his brand on his diva personality, and that sort of personality and outlook just isn’t hip anymore. Fashion is always about moving forward, and Lagerfeld’s beliefs should remain fossilized in the past.

Notes
1988
Posted
10 months ago

yaggerdangs-remedy:

I’m so stressed out I need to look at 700 pics of my favorite old men

(via deadtothebones)

Notes
5510
Posted
10 months ago

The worst thing is that Karl pioneered the whole “smother everything in logos and call it fashion” thing which i HATE seriously there is no kind of “fashion“ I find more odious than just putting a logo on it. that’s branding, not couture. It’s not artistic and and it’s not creative, it’s boring and it’s tacky and I hate it so much.

Notes
560
Posted
10 months ago

whalepunk:

poetrylesbian:

they should make a pill that makes people in their 20s feel good about where their lives are going

image

Impressive to me that no one said the same thing twice

(via ameliafromafairytale)

Notes
138380
Posted
10 months ago

veneroid:

image
image
image
image
image
image

florence + the machine // mermaids

(via deadtothebones)

Notes
1477
Posted
10 months ago

unichrome:

I’m slowly beginning to accept the reality that 2007 was not last year but in fact almost four years ago

(via trash1994)

Notes
89089
Posted
10 months ago

kitsuragied:

good-enemy:

Mama, we all go to hell, mama, we all go to hell, I’m writing this letter, in pink glitter gel,

image

(via ameliafromafairytale)

Notes
69027
Posted
10 months ago
ThemesLtd.com has Tumblr Themes, Twitter Backgrounds, Facebook Covers, Tumblr Music Player and Tumblr Follower Counter